Legal Opinion

Harpham v. General Casualty Co.

Nebraska Supreme Court

Decided June 16, 1989No. 88-752PublishedCited by 10 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtCaporale, J.

In this workers’ compensation case the plaintiff-appellant, Delbert W. Harpham, challenges the failure of the Workers’ Compensation Court to order his compensation carrier, defendant-appellee General Casualty Company, to pay additional benefits. He asserts, in summary, that the compensation court erred in (1) admitting certain videotaped evidence, (2) limiting his cross-examination in connection with those videotapes, (3) relying upon the same tapes to reach its determination, and (4) failing to award him an attorney fee.

Harpham is a 54-year-old man possessed of a general equivalency diploma…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Fite v. Ammco Tools, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1977
  2. Friedeman v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Gardner v. Beatrice Foods Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  4. Blanchette v. Keith County Bank & Trust Co.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1989
  5. Rodriquez v. Prime Meat ProcessorsNebraska Supreme Court · 1988

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Paulsen v. StateNebraska Supreme Court · 1996
  2. Aken v. Nebraska Methodist HospitalNebraska Supreme Court · 1994
  3. Sherard v. Bethphage Mission, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1991
  4. Sheridan v. Catering Management, Inc.Nebraska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Grady v. Visiting Nurse Ass'nNebraska Supreme Court · 1994

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API