Eno v. . Crooke

[EDITORS' NOTE: THIS PAGE CONTAINS HEADNOTES. HEADNOTES ARE NOT AN OFFICIAL PRODUCT OF THE COURT, THEREFORE THEY ARE NOT DISPLAYED.] The first and second propositions presented by the counsel for the appellant upon the argument were based upon the third, fourth and fifth objections taken upon the trial on the motion to dismiss the complaint, and were, in substance, that Bonesteel took the judgment under the assignment from the bank as trustee for Smith, that it did not therefore pass to his assignees, and that the action should therefore have been brought in his name. If Mr. Bonesteel did…