Legal Opinion
Laurencelle v. Laurencelle
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided June 4, 1926PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtJaycox, J.
This action is brought to recover upon a promissory note, dated May 14, 1913, payable in three months after date. The note was made by the defendant in Montreal, Canada, and payable to the plaintiff at the Provincial Bank of Canady.
*160The answer of the defendant makes some denials as to presentment and ownership, but they are insufficient to raise an issue. The defendant then alleges, as a defense, that at the time of the making of the note the plaintiff was a resident of the State of New York and has continuously resided there ever since; that during the same time the defendant was and has been…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Jacobus v. . ColgateNew York Court of Appeals · 1916
- Ruggles v. KeelerNew York Supreme Court · 1808
- Olcott v. . the Tioga Railroad CompanyNew York Court of Appeals · 1859
- Ackerman v. . AckermanNew York Court of Appeals · 1910
- Whiting v. MillerAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1919
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Gutkind v. George Lueders & Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1935
- In re the Accounting of HeyeNew York Supreme Court · 1949
- Davis v. CollinsAppellate Terms of the Supreme Court of New York · 1930
- In re the Estate of SmathersNew York Surrogate's Court · 1934