Legal Opinion
Anglin & Stevenson v. United States
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided March 21, 1947No. 3410PublishedCited by 12 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MURRAH, Circuit Judge.
The sole question presented by this appeal is whether interest is chargeable on a judgment against the United States as guardian for full-blood restricted Indian heirs, payable out of restricted funds belonging to the Indians in the custody of the Secretary of the Interior.
In Scott v. Beams, 122 F.2d 777, certiorari denied 315 U. S. 809, 62 S.Ct. 795, 86 L.Ed. 1209, we sustained the trial court’s decree determining heirship and settling the Estate of Jackson Barnett, a full-blood Creek Indian, who died seized of a restricted estate in the custody and control of the…
2Cases cited18 opinions
- Miller v. RobertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1924
- United States v. N. Y. Rayon Importing Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
- Weil v. NearySupreme Court of the United States · 1929
- Bramwell v. United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1925
- United States v. Thayer-West Point Hotel Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1947
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by12 opinions
- Arenas v. Preston United States v. PrestonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1950
- Norman E. Holly v. Robert E. Chasen, Commissioner of CustomsCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1981
- Thompson v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1981
- The Peoria Tribe of Indians of Oklahoma v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1966
- United States v. 1,433 Acres of LandDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1947
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.