Legal Opinion

Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina

Supreme Court of South Carolina

Decided August 20, 2001No. 25345PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BURNETT, Justice:

This Court granted a writ of certiorari to review Tatum v. Medical University of South Carolina, 335 S.C. 499, 511, 517 S.E.2d 706, 713 (Ct.App.1999), in which the Court of Appeals adopted the “dual persona doctrine” and held “where [an] employer-hospital and its physicians negligently treat an employee for a work-related accident and, in doing so, exacerbate the injury,” a tort action may be maintained by the employee against the employer-hospital. We reverse.

*197 FACTS

Respondent Tatum (Mrs. Tatum) injured her back in the course of her employment with Petitioner Medical…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited36 opinions

  1. Billy v. Consolidated Machine Tool Corp.New York Court of Appeals · 1980
  2. Gurry v. Cumberland Farms, Inc.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1990
  3. Bernardo Balancio v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1959
  4. Schweiner v. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 1984
  5. McAlister v. Methodist Hospital of MemphisTennessee Supreme Court · 1977

31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Flateau v. HarrelsonCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2003
  2. Edens v. BelliniCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004
  3. Posey v. Proper Mold & Engineering, Inc.Court of Appeals of South Carolina · 2008
  4. Ashley River Properties I, LLC v. Ashley River Properties II, LLCCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2007
  5. Fuller v. BlanchardCourt of Appeals of South Carolina · 2004

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API