Legal Opinion

Zurn Industries, Inc. v. Commonwealth

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided September 7, 1979No. Appeal, No. 2888 C.D. 1978PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Blatt,

The petitioner, Zurn Industries, Inc., appeals here from an order by the Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board (Board) which remanded the instant case to the referee to permit the introduction of so-called “after-discovered evidence. ’ ’

It is well settled that a remand order is interlocutory and therefore generally unappealable. American Can Co. v. Workmen’s Compensation Appeal Board, 37 Pa. Commonwealth Ct. 169, 389 A.2d 263 (1978).; The only exceptions to this rule are for appeals where the Board had no jurisdiction because the appeals from the referee were not timely,…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Riley Stoker Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  3. United Metal Fabricators, Inc. v. ZindashCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1973
  4. Flynn v. Asten Hill Manufacturing Co.Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978
  5. American Can Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Simeone v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  2. Schuster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API