Legal Opinion

Schuster v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board

Commonwealth Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 2, 1983No. Appeal, No. 1966 C.D. 1981PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

Judge Rogers,

On October 5, 1973, Richard Schuster was engaged in the mill of his employer, Lee Tire and Rubber Company. Mr. Schuster, hired by Lee Tire as a white-collar office worker, had -been sent into the mill along with other office workers in order to prevent a cessation in tire production due to an ongoing labor dispute with the employer’s unionized employee®. In his attempt to carry out the unaccustomed duties in the mill, which involved the manipulation of sheets and rolls of rubber weighing in excess of two hundred pounds and the division of these rolls from the machine of…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Forbes Pavilion Nursing Home, Inc. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  2. Workmen's Compensation Appeal Board v. HartliebSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1975
  3. McGartland v. Ampco-Pittsburgh Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Gindy Manufacturing Co. v. CommonwealthCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  5. Morrow v. James S. Murray & SonsSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1939

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. Joseph v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1989
  2. Shustack v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1991
  3. Simeone v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1990
  4. Berry v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1992
  5. 1 Contracting Corp. v. Workmen's Compensation Appeal BoardCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1983

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API