Legal Opinion

Rohmiller v. Hart

Court of Appeals of Minnesota

Decided April 19, 2011No. A10-1348PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

CONNOLLY, Judge.

Respondents, the maternal grandfather and aunt of a minor child whose mother had died, successfully petitioned the district court for visitation rights to the child. Appellant, the child’s father, challenges the amount of visitation time granted to the grandfather and the granting of any visitation to the aunt. Because the district court did not abuse its discretion in determining the amount of the grandfather’s visitation time, we affirm in part; because neither statutory nor common law confers on the district court the power to grant visitation rights to the aunt, we…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. Troxel v. GranvilleSupreme Court of the United States · 2000
  2. Thiele v. StichSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1988
  3. Premier Bank v. BECKER DEVELOPMENT, LLCSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2010
  4. Price v. SheppardSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1976
  5. Tereault v. PalmerCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 1987

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Rohmiller v. HartSupreme Court of Minnesota · 2012
  2. Givens v. DarstCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2011
  3. Joyce Elaine Hansen v. Jeffrey Ray Hanson, Joni Michelle HerdrichCourt of Appeals of Minnesota · 2015

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API