Legal Opinion

Stringer v. Kaytes

Superior Court of Pennsylvania

Decided May 8, 1981No. 114PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

CERCONE, President Judge:

This is an appeal from the order of the court below vacating an earlier order which had dismissed plaintiff-ap-pellee’s action with prejudice for failure to prosecute, and reinstating the action. For the reasons which follow, we reverse and remand.

The pertinent events giving rise to this appeal may be summarized as follows. On February 2, 1973, plaintiff commenced an action in trespass by issuance of a summons. Plaintiff’s complaint was subsequently filed on March 9, 1973. The last activity on the docket prior to dismissal of the action was on December 17, 1973, when…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Ruczynski v. Jesray Construction Corp.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  2. International Telephone & Telegraph Corp. v. Philadelphia Electric Co.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1977
  3. Corcoran v. FiorentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Coffey v. FaixSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1967

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Taylor v. Oxford Land, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  2. Martin v. Grandview HospitalSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988
  3. Wurster v. PetersSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1983
  4. Setty v. KneppSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1998
  5. Matusow v. ZiegerCommonwealth Court of Pennsylvania · 1997

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API