Legal Opinion

Wurster v. Peters

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided August 19, 1983No. 147PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BROSKY, Judge:

The issue before us in this appeal is whether the lower court erred in vacating a judgment of non pros which had *48been entered in appellant’s favor. Because we find that the judgment should not have been removed, we reverse.

Appellees commenced this action by writ of summons on March 19, 1965. They seek damages for personal injuries allegedly suffered in an automobile accident which occurred on January 26, 1964.

A complaint was filed on February 15, 1966. Various pleadings as well as interrogatories were filed between that date and February 4, 1972 when previous counsel withdrew…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Corcoran v. FiorentinoSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  2. Boyles v. SullivanSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1974
  3. Faulks v. Papo Bar, Inc.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 1980
  4. Stringer v. KaytesSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1981
  5. Stawiarski v. HallSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1982

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Geyer v. SteinbronnSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1986
  2. Metz Contracting, Inc. v. Riverwood Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1987
  3. Buxbaum v. PegueroSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1984
  4. Taylor v. Oxford Land, Inc.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1985
  5. Williams Studio Division of Photography Ex Rel. Tallas, Inc. v. Nationwide Mutual Fire InsuranceSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1988

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API