Heinlein v. Imperial Life Insurance
Michigan Supreme Court
Appeal from Bay. (Cobb, J.) Bill to revive a life insurance policy. Complainant-appeals. The facts are stated in the opinion.
1Opinion of the CourtMcGrath, C. J.
This is a bill to revive a life insurance policy, issued December 22, 1890, on the life of Margaretha Heinlein, and payable “ to Henry Heinlein, Jr., her son, if living; if not living, to the executors, administrator, or assigns of the said insured.”
One Smith, an insurance agent, applied to Henry Heinlein to take out insurance. Heinlein replied that he did not desire to take out a policy, but that his mother had spoken to him about insurance, and he thought that she wanted insurance. Smith requested him to see his mother, and let him know. Afterwards Smith, who was accompanied by a physician,…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Campbell v. New England Mutual Life InsuranceMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1867
- Renard v. ClinkMichigan Supreme Court · 1892
- Amick v. ButlerIndiana Supreme Court · 1887
- Tabor v. Michigan Mutual Life InsuranceMichigan Supreme Court · 1880
3Cited by21 opinions
- Hess' Admr. v. SegenfelterCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1907
- Pacific Mut. Life Ins. Co. of Cal. v. O'NeilSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
- Russell v. GrigsbyCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909
- Wayland v. Western Life Indemnity Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1912
- Gristy v. HudgensArizona Supreme Court · 1922
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.