Legal Opinion

Russell v. Grigsby

Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit

Decided March 22, 1909No. 1,864PublishedCited by 22 opinions

Appeal from the Circuit Court of the United States for the Middle District of Tennessee.

1Opinion of the Court

LURTON, Circuit Judge.

Under a bill of interpleader, the Penn Mutual Life Insurance Company, a corporation of the state of Pennsylvania, paid into the court below $10,000 due from it upon a policy of insurance upon the life of John C. Burchard, and the only question is as to whether the fund shall be paid to an assignee of the policy or to the administrators of the assured.

The facts necessary to be stated are these: Upon the personal application of the assured, John C. Burchard, an ordinary life policy was issued to him January 23, 1903. The assured lived in Tennessee. The contract was…

2Cases cited34 opinions

  1. Swift v. TysonSupreme Court of the United States · 1842
  2. Baltimore & Ohio Railroad v. BaughSupreme Court of the United States · 1893
  3. New York Mutual Life Insurance v. ArmstrongSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  4. Warnock v. DavisSupreme Court of the United States · 1882
  5. Carpenter v. Providence Washington InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1842

29 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by22 opinions

  1. Grigsby v. RussellSupreme Court of the United States · 1911
  2. McDonald, Adm'r v. StrawnSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1920
  3. National City Bank v. National Security Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1932
  4. Merchants' & Manufacturers' Securities Co. v. JohnsonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1934
  5. Le Sueur v. Manufacturers' Finance Co.Court of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1922

17 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API