Legal Opinion

Ohio Willow Wood Co. v. Thermo-Ply, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Texas

Decided February 3, 2011No. 2:07-cv-00274PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM AND ORDER DENYING JOINT MOTION TO VACATE

RON CLARK, District Judge.

Plaintiff The Ohio Willow Wood Company (“OWW”) filed suit against Defendant Thermo-Ply, Inc. alleging infringement of United States Patent No. 7,291,182 (“the '182 patent”). This court granted Thermo-Ply’s motion for summary judgment, holding that most of the claims of the '182 patent were invalid as obvious, and entered Final Judgment.

Both parties appealed. As part of the Federal Circuit’s mediation program 1 , the parties were ordered to participate in mandatory mediation. The parties reached a settlement…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. Cybor Corporation v. Fas Technologies, Inc., and Fastar Ltd., Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1998
  2. Jack B. Anglin Co., Inc. v. TippsTexas Supreme Court · 1992
  3. U.S. Bancorp Mortgage Co. v. Bonner Mall PartnershipSupreme Court of the United States · 1994
  4. Cardinal Chemical Co. v. Morton International, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1993
  5. Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Cunningham & Associates, Plc v. Arag, LLCDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
  2. C&C Properties, Inc. v. Shell Pipeline CompanyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2025
  3. Capsa Solutions LLC v. Howard Industries, Inc.District Court, S.D. Mississippi · 2026
  4. Jackson v. EK Real Estate Services of NY, LLCDistrict Court, S.D. Texas · 2021

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API