Legal Opinion
Trading Technologies International, Inc. v. eSpeed, Inc.
Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit
Decided February 25, 2010No. 2008-1392, 2008-1393, 2008-1422PublishedCited by 90 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion for the court filed by Circuit Judge RADER, in which District Judge CLARK joins. Circuit Judge LOURIE concurs in the result. Concurring opinion filed by District Judge CLARK.
RADER, Circuit Judge.
The United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois held that eS-peed, Inc., Ecco LLC, Ecco Ware Ltd., and eSpeed International Ltd. (collectively, “eSpeed”) infringed the asserted claims of U.S. Patent No. 6,772,132 (“'132 patent”) and U.S. Patent No. 6,766,304 (“'304 patent”) with one accused service product, but not willfully. The district court further held that the two…
2Cases cited45 opinions
- MARKMAN Et Al. v. WESTVIEW INSTRUMENTS, INC., Et Al.Supreme Court of the United States · 1996
- Edward H. Phillips v. Awh Corporation, Hopeman Brothers, Inc., and Lofton Corporation, Defendants-CrossCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2006
- Herbert Markman and Positek, Inc. v. Westview Instruments, Inc. And Althon Enterprises, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1995
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Miller v. FentonSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by90 opinions
- 3m Innovative Properties v. Tredegar CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2013
- Research Corp. Technologies, Inc. v. Microsoft Corp.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2010
- Streck, Inc. v. Research & Diagnostic Systems, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2012
- Oracle America, Inc. v. Google Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2014
- Star Scientific, Inc. v. R.J. Reynolds Tobacco Co.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011
85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.