Legal Opinion
Cunningham & Associates, Plc v. Arag, LLC
District Court, District of Columbia
Decided January 31, 2012No. Civil Action No. 2011-1983PublishedCited by 5 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
BERYL A. HOWELL, District Judge.
Pending before the Court is defendants ARAG, LLC, ARAG Services, LLC, and ARAG Insurance Company’s Motion to Compel Mediation or, in the Alternative, to Dismiss. ECF No. 3. The defendants contend, inter alia, that the contract underlying this dispute requires plaintiffs Cunningham & Associates, PLC and Joseph Cunningham to submit to mediation prior to proceeding with this case. For the reasons explained below, the Court agrees and the defendants’ motion to compel mediation is granted.
I. BACKGROUND
Plaintiffs Cunningham & Associates, PLC and…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Continental Casualty Company, an Illinois Insurance Company v. American National Insurance Company, a Texas Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- Halim v. Great Gatsby's Auction Gallery, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2008
- Long Island Savings Bank, FSB v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2007
- Washington Metropolitan Area Transit Authority to the Use and Benefit of Head Construction Company v. Mergentime Corporation, (Two Cases)Court of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1980
- Leake v. PRENSKYDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2011
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Stone & Webster, Inc. v. Georgia Power CompanyDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2013
- (PC) Love v. HillDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2022
- Cherrington v. YatesDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2021
- Fitzgerald v. TillersonDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2024
- Phillips v. AngelDistrict Court, D. South Dakota · 2025