Legal Opinion
Bardsley v. Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrle & Bowman, P.C.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 20, 1996No. 95-CV-2287PublishedCited by 7 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
JOYNER, District Judge.
This Memorandum and Order addresses four outstanding motions filed by the plaintiff in this dispute arising from a struggle for control of Inofast Manufacturing, Inc. (“Ino-fast”), a Pennsylvania corporation. The plaintiff is Norman Bardsley (“Norman”), a United States citizen domiciled in Austria, and a shareholder and director of Inofast. Norman commenced this action by filing a complaint on April 19, 1995 and an amended complaint on July 5, 1995. The defendants include the Montgomery County law firm of Powell, Trachtman, Logan, Carrie & Bowman,…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Sedima, S. P. R. L. v. Imrex Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- H. J. Inc. v. Northwestern Bell Telephone Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1989
- Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by7 opinions
- Barbara Bowers v. The Ophthalmology GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
- Inofast Manufacturing, Inc. v. BardsleyDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 2000
- Brown v. Access Midstream Partners, L.P.District Court, M.D. Pennsylvania · 2015
- Bardsley v. LawrenceDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1997
- Barbara Bowers v. The Ophthalmology GroupCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2013
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.