Legal Opinion
Bardsley v. Lawrence
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided February 12, 1997No. 2:96-cv-08460PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
JOYNER, District Judge.
Before the Court is the Motion of Defendant Judge Marjorie C. Lawrence (“Defendant” or “Judge Lawrence”) to Dismiss Plaintiffs Complaint. Plaintiff Norman Bardsley (“Plaintiff’ or “Bardsley”), a pro se litigant, has also moved for the preliminary and permanent injunctive relief demanded in the three counts of his Complaint. For the following reasons, we grant Defendant’s Motion to Dismiss and, accordingly, deny Plaintiffs motions as moot.
BACKGROUND
This is the third lawsuit arising ultimately from a series of allegedly improper stock transactions that divested…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- District of Columbia Court of Appeals v. FeldmanSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Rooker v. Fidelity Trust Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1924
- Pension Benefit Guaranty Corporation v. White Consolidated Industries, Inc., C/o Ct Corporation Systems Registered AgentCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1993
- Tobye R. Markowitz, Individually and on Behalf of All Others Similarly Situated v. Northeast Land Company. Appeal of Tobye R. MarkowitzCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1990
- Schrob v. CattersonCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1991
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Norman Bardsley, Inofast Manufacturing, Inc. v. Marjorie Lawrence, JudgeCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1997