Legal Opinion

Abernathy v. . Skidmore

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 24, 1925PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtClauksoN, J.

It is with some reluctance tbat we feel compelled to send this action back for a new trial. Tbe case seems to bave been carefully tried in tbe court below by tbe able and distinguished jurist, who for long years adorned tbe Superior Court bench and has since died.

Plaintiffs’ exception and assignment of error No. 2, — “to tbe exclusion by tbe court below of certain evidence as hereafter appears: Mrs. Ollie Herms, witness for plaintiff.

“Q. Just state what tbat conversation was?
“Objection by defendant, J. M. Skidmore, on the ground tbat this is in purview of C. S., 1795. Counsel states tbat tbe…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Zollicoffer v. . ZollicofferSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1915
  2. Johnson v. Cameron.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1904
  3. Brown v. . AdamsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1917
  4. Highsmith v. PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1913
  5. Reece v. . WoodsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1920

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Burton v. . StyersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1936
  2. Price v. WhisnantSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1950
  3. State Ex Rel. Wilder v. MedlinSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1939
  4. Turlington v. . NeighborsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943
  5. Wingler v. . MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1943

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API