Legal Opinion

Highsmith v. Page

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided March 5, 1913PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal by defendant from Cline, Jat September Term, 1912, of Pitt.

1Opinion of the Court

Clare, O. J.

This cause was before us, 158 N. C., 226, where the facts are fully stated. The action was brought by the plaintiffs, who are the children and grandchildren of Elizabeth Page, now deceased, to reform a deed and to remove certain conveyances which are alleged, to be clouds upon the title and to restrain the cutting and removing timber from the land. The complaint alleges that M. R. Page and his wife, Elizabeth, purchased from S. R. Ross a tract of land, Mrs. Page 'buying for herself and paying for that part of the land which lay on the east side of the canal and her husband that…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bunn v. . ToddSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1890
  2. Highsmith v. . PageSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1912

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Abernathy v. . SkidmoreSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  2. Helsabeck v. . GrubbsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1916
  3. Davenport v. . GrissomSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1893

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API