Legal Opinion

Price v. Whisnant

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided November 22, 1950No. 315PublishedCited by 17 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtDeNNy, J.

Tbe defendants assign as error tbe admission of plaintiff’s testimony, over objection, to tbe effect that tbe defendant A. H. McRary, wbo is now non compos mentis, sent for him “quite a few years ago” to meet him at a designated place; that be did so and McRary bad Charles Rarlow (now deceased), tbe County Surveyor, to run certain lines, one of wbieb is now in dispute.

We tbink tbis evidence coming from tbe plaintiff was inadmissible. It was evidence concerning a transaction between tbe witness and tbe defendant, wbo is non compos mentis. Sucb testimony is inhibited by tbe provisions of Gr.S.…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Speas v. Merchants Bank & Trust Co.Supreme Court of North Carolina · 1924
  2. Hunt v. EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925
  3. Star Manufacturing Co. v. Atlantic Coast Line RailroadSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1942
  4. Vance v. . GuySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1944
  5. Hunt v. . EureSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1925

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by17 opinions

  1. In Re Housing Authority of City of SalisburySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1952
  2. State v. JohnsonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1972
  3. Carver v. LykesSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1964
  4. State v. LittleSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971
  5. State v. OwensSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1971

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API