Legal Opinion
Rainwater v. State Ex Rel. Strickland
Supreme Court of Alabama
Decided February 23, 1939No. 7 Div. 548PublishedCited by 18 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
BROWN, Justice.
Action in the nature of quo warranto, authorized by §§ 9932, 9938, of the Code, instituted on the relation of appellees, Strickland, Nicholls and DeLoach, against appellants to oust appellants from the office of Aldermen of the Town of Childersburg, a municipal corporation, the relators joining as plaintiffs, seeking their installation in said offices.
The sufficiency of the complaint is not questioned, but the court sustained a demurrer to defendants’ pleas 3, 6, 7, 8, 9 and 10, the defendants refused to plead over, suffered judgment and appeal. Pleas 3, 6, 7 and 8 go to the…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Fox v. McDonaldSupreme Court of Alabama · 1893
- City of Eufaula v. McNabSupreme Court of Alabama · 1880
- People ex rel. Young v. Trustees of FairburyIllinois Supreme Court · 1869
- Coles County v. AllisonIllinois Supreme Court · 1860
- Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. MayburyMichigan Supreme Court · 1905
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by18 opinions
- Cosby v. MooreSupreme Court of Alabama · 1953
- Haack v. RanieriNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1964
- Cotton v. City of ElmaCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Baxter v. State Ex Rel. MetcalfSupreme Court of Alabama · 1942
- Pueblo ex rel. Castro v. Padrón RiveraSupreme Court of Puerto Rico · 1942
13 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.