Legal Opinion

Attorney General ex rel. Moreland v. Maybury

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 21, 1905No. Docket No. 194PublishedCited by 13 opinions

Error to Wayne; Rohnert, J. Quo warranto proceedings by Charles A. Blair, attorney general, on the relation of De Witt H. Moreland, against William H. Maybury to try the title to the office of commissioner of public works in the city of Detroit. There was judgment for respondent, and relator brings error.

1Opinion of the CourtMcAlvay, J.

This is a proceeding by the attorney general, on the relation of De Witt H. Moreland, upon an information in the nature of a quo warranto against respondent, William H. Maybury, to test his right and title to the office of commissioner of public works of the city of Detroit.

In answer to the charge that he has usurped, intruded into, and unlawfully held and exercised this office, respondent set up in his plea and rejoinder that on June 28, 1903, said office became and was vacant, and respondent was appointed by the mayor to fill the vacancy for the unexpired term thereof, and took his oath of…

2Cited by13 opinions

  1. Bell v. Treasurer of CambridgeMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1941
  2. State ex rel. Smallwood v. WindomSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1915
  3. Rainwater v. State Ex Rel. StricklandSupreme Court of Alabama · 1939
  4. State ex rel. Deering v. HarmonSupreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1916
  5. Scofield v. United States ex rel. BondCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1909

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API