Legal Opinion

Hofmann v. Von Wirth

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided December 1, 1995No. S-6597/6617PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

I. FACTS AND PROCEEDINGS

Werner Hofmann and Brigitta von Wirth are German nationals, formerly married. A travel agency owned by von Wirth purchased land in Alaska and developed it. In January 1993, while on a visit to Anchorage, von Wirth signed a deed conveying the property to herself and Hofmann as tenants in common. The property was not divided in a German divorce proceeding that took place in April of that year. Von Wirth incurred costs for the maintenance and upkeep of the property from 1983 to 1993; these costs varied from year to year and were not reimbursed by…

2Cases cited16 opinions

  1. State v. PhillipsAlaska Supreme Court · 1970
  2. Bevins v. Peoples Bank & Trust Co.Alaska Supreme Court · 1983
  3. Alascom, Inc. v. North Slope Borough, Board of EqualizationAlaska Supreme Court · 1983
  4. Car Wash Enterprises, Inc. v. KampanosCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1994
  5. Glimcher v. ReinhornOhio Court of Appeals · 1991

11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Beaux v. JacobAlaska Supreme Court · 2001
  2. Johnson v. Olympic Liquidating TrustAlaska Supreme Court · 1998
  3. Cline v. ClineAlaska Supreme Court · 2004
  4. Ebasco Constructors, Inc. v. Ahtna, Inc.Alaska Supreme Court · 1997
  5. Henash v. IpalookAlaska Supreme Court · 1999

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API