Legal Opinion
Kittitas Reclamation District v. Spider Staging Corp.
Court of Appeals of Washington
Decided July 26, 2001No. 19535-0-IIIPublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtKato, J.
Kittitas Reclamation District (Kittitas) contracted with Spider Staging Corporation (Spider) to design and build an incline inspection platform. During a demonstration, the platform did not function successfully. Kittitas demanded that Spider deliver a platform fit for its intended purposes or the platform would be rejected. Spider did not respond. Kittitas then sued Spider and its parent company, Flow International Corporation (Flow), for cancellation of contract and damages. The court found in favor of Kittitas and ordered Spider to pay $27,248.17, the cost of the platform. Claiming, among…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Long Island Lighting Co. v. Transamerica Delaval, Inc.District Court, S.D. New York · 1986
- Flagg Energy Development Corp. v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- Ontario Hydro v. Zallea Systems, Inc.District Court, D. Delaware · 1983
- Central Washington Refrigeration, Inc. v. BarbeeWashington Supreme Court · 1997
- H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corp.District Court, S.D. New York · 1990
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- Elward v. Electrolux Home Products, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 2017
- Kittitas Reclamation v. Spider StagingCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2001
- Maadanian v. Mercedes-Benz USA LLCDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024