H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corp.
District Court, S.D. New York
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.
RELIEF SOUGHT
Defendant Airtemp Corporation (“Air-temp”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) dismissing the amended complaint of plaintiff H. Sand & Co. Inc. (Sand) on the grounds that: (a) plaintiff Sand did not initiate litigation until more than four years after tender of delivery of the goods and thus, under New York Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) § 2-725 this action is time-barred; (b) Sand expressly assented to Airtemp’s warranty terms in writing which expired long before Sand made any claim for service thereunder; or (c)…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. KeoghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
- Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
- Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
- Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
- City of New York v. Pullman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by21 opinions
- H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
- Selzer v. Brunsell Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
- Webco Industries, Inc. v. Thermatool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
- Giraud v. Quincy Farm and ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
- Giraud v. Quincy Farm & ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.