Legal Opinion

H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided May 30, 1990No. 83 Civ. 5722 (IBC)PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

IRVING BEN COOPER, District Judge.

RELIEF SOUGHT

Defendant Airtemp Corporation (“Air-temp”) moves for summary judgment pursuant to Fed.R.Civ.P. 56(b) dismissing the amended complaint of plaintiff H. Sand & Co. Inc. (Sand) on the grounds that: (a) plaintiff Sand did not initiate litigation until more than four years after tender of delivery of the goods and thus, under New York Uniform Commercial Code (U.C.C.) § 2-725 this action is time-barred; (b) Sand expressly assented to Airtemp’s warranty terms in writing which expired long before Sand made any claim for service thereunder; or (c)…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. The Washington Post Company v. Eugene J. KeoghCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1966
  2. Mary Elizabeth Foy Donnelly v. H. Gibson GuionCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1972
  3. Jacobson v. SassowerNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  4. Walling v. Fairmont Creamery Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1943
  5. City of New York v. Pullman Inc.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1981

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. H. Sand & Co., Inc. v. Airtemp CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1991
  2. Selzer v. Brunsell Brothers, Ltd.Court of Appeals of Wisconsin · 2002
  3. Webco Industries, Inc. v. Thermatool Corp.Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 2002
  4. Giraud v. Quincy Farm and ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000
  5. Giraud v. Quincy Farm & ChemicalCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2000

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API