Midland Railway Co. v. Trissal
Indiana Court of Appeals
Erom Madison Circuit Court; J. F. McClure, Judge. Suit by one Wilcox against the Midland Railway Company to foreclose a mechanic’s lien. Erancis M. Trissal filed a cross-complaint for attorney’s fees, the case was submitted to a master commissioner and judgment was rendered on the commissioner’s report in favor of Trissal, and the railway company appeals.
1Opinion of the CourtRobinson, J.
One Wilcox sued appellant and Holloran and Ingerman to foreclose a mechanic’s lien on ap*78pellant’s road. Holloran and. Ingerman filed a cross-complaint to foreclose liens held by them. In that action appellee was the attorney for Holloran and Ingerman. A trial resulted in a judgment and decree in favor of Wilcox upon the complaint, and in favor of the cross-complainants on their cross-complaint for $3,594.94, and the further' sum of $355.64 attorney’s fees for services in that action. Appellee had rendered Holloran and Ingerman other services, but it was agreed that appellee should charge the…
2Cases cited21 opinions
- Dudley v. PiggIndiana Supreme Court · 1897
- Holloran v. Midland Railway Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 1891
- Bremmerman v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Preston v. Sandford's AdministratorIndiana Supreme Court · 1863
- Midland Railway Co. v. WilcoxIndiana Supreme Court · 1890
16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Mitchell v. GodseyIndiana Court of Appeals · 1941
- Doak-Riddle-Hamilton Co. v. RaabeIndiana Court of Appeals · 1916