Legal Opinion

Doak-Riddle-Hamilton Co. v. Raabe

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 14, 1916No. 9,146PublishedCited by 3 opinions

From Vigo Superior Court; John E. Cox, Judge. Action by the Doak-Riddle-Hamilton Company against Herman Raabe. Prom a judgment in part for plaintiff, the plaintiff appeals.

1Opinion of the CourtCaldwell, J.

Appellant, an Indiana insurance company, brought this action against appellee, who was formerly its agent, to recover on account of certain expense money advanced to appellee and certain insurance premiums alleged to have been collected by him and not accounted for. The cause having been placed at issue was referred to a master commissioner, appointed under the provisions of §1677 Burns 1914, §1397 R. S. 1881 “to.hear the evidence, ascertain the facts and report his findings.” The court adopted the report as made, except specification No. 8 thereof, and on the report as adopted found…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bremmerman v. JenningsIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
  2. McKinney v. PierceIndiana Supreme Court · 1854
  3. Stanton v. State ex rel. GreenIndiana Supreme Court · 1882
  4. Smith v. HarrisIndiana Supreme Court · 1893
  5. Midland Railway Co. v. TrissalIndiana Court of Appeals · 1902

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. River Road Lounge, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992
  2. Clay v. Eagle Reciprocal ExchangeSupreme Court of Missouri · 1963
  3. Indiana Alcoholic Beverage Commission v. River Road Lounge, Inc.Indiana Court of Appeals · 1992

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API