State v. Williams
Supreme Court of Missouri
Error to Polk Circuit Court. The indictment does not charge the defendant with any indictable offence. The act of 1845 is repealed by the act of 1847, so far as relates to the matter charged m the indictment.
1Opinion of the CourtRyland, Judge
At the April term of the Circuit Court within and for the cJfonty of Polk, in the year of our Lord eighteen hundred and fifty-three, the defendant, William Williams, was indicted by the grand jury. The indictment charges that the defendant, at, &c., on, &c., did then and there take up a stray, to-wit, one stray steer, which was not then and there claimed and proved within five days from the day of taking up the same ; and that *390said defendant did not, within five days from the day of taking up said stray, take the said steer before a justice of the peace, &c., and make oath that said steer was…
2Cited by1 opinion
- Starck v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1878