Jerome S. Spevack v. The United States
United States Court of Claims
1Opinion of the Court
ON DEFENDANT’S AND PLAINTIFF’S MOTIONS FOR SUMMARY JUDGMENT
2Per curiam
This ease was referred to Trial Commissioner James F. Davis with directions to make recommendation for conclusions of law under Rule 54(b). The commissioner has done so in an opinion and report filed on March 7, 1967, in which the facts necessary to the opinion are stated therein, and a memorandum ** supplementing report of commissioner filed August 3, 1967. The case has been submitted to the court on requests for review by the parties of the commissioner’s opinion and memorandum report, oral argument of counsel and the briefs of the…
3Cases cited9 opinions
- The Japanese War Notes Association of the Philippines, Inc. (Japwancap, Inc.) v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
- Guessefeldt v. McGrathSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1952
- Art Center School v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
- Dion v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1956
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by23 opinions
- The Menominee Tribe of Indians, and Cross-Appellees v. The United States, and Cross-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1984
- Manchester Band of Pomo Indians, Inc. v. United StatesDistrict Court, N.D. California · 1973
- Petro-Hunt, L.L.C. v. United StatesUnited States Court of Federal Claims · 2009
- Warrington v. Charles Pfizer & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1969
- Pollard v. United StatesDistrict Court, M.D. Alabama · 1974
18 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.