Legal Opinion
United States v. New Wrinkle, Inc.
Supreme Court of the United States
Decided February 4, 1952No. 250PublishedCited by 86 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Mk. Justice Reed
delivered the opinion of the Court.
This suit against New Wrinkle, Inc., and The Kay & Ess Co. was instituted in the United States District Court for the Southern District of Ohio by the United States, as a civil proceeding under § 4 óf the Sherman Act. 1 Defendants are charged with having violated § 1 of that law 2 by conspiring to fix uniform minimum prices and to eliminate competition throughout substantially all of the wrinkle finish industry 3 of the United Statés by means of patent license agreements. Motions to. dismiss the suit were filed by defendants. The defendant…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. South-Eastern Underwriters Assn.Supreme Court of the United States · 1944
- United States v. Paramount Pictures, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Apex Hosiery Co. v. LeaderSupreme Court of the United States · 1940
- United States v. Trenton Potteries Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1927
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by86 opinions
- Walker Process Equipment, Inc. v. Food MacHinery & Chemical Corp.Supreme Court of the United States · 1965
- Quality Foods De Centro America, S.A. And Duroparts De El Salvador, S.A. v. Latin American Agribusiness Development Corporation, S.A.Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1983
- United States v. Arnold, Schwinn & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Vanity Fair Mills, Inc. v. The T. Eaton Co. Limited and John David EatonCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1956
- Checker Motors Corporation v. Chrysler Corporation and Chrysler Motors Corporation, Checker Taxi Company, Inc., Additional on CounterclaimCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1969
81 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.