Legal Opinion

Warrington v. Charles Pfizer & Co.

California Court of Appeal

Decided July 2, 1969No. Civ. 33302PublishedCited by 41 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRoth, P. J.

This is an appeal from a judgment of dismissal predicated upon an order sustaining Charles Pfizer & Co., Inc.’s (respondent) general demurrer to the third amended complaint of Barbara L. Warrington (appellant), without leave to amend.

Respondent demurred to the third amended complaint (complaint), as it did to each of the three prior pleadings (except the second amended complaint) 1 on the sole ground that the causes of action alleged therein arising from personal injuries (ailments) suffered by ingestion of a. drug “diabenese” manufactured and distributed by respondent, are barred by the…

2Cases cited45 opinions

  1. Urie v. ThompsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1949
  2. Lucas v. HammCalifornia Supreme Court · 1961
  3. Ayers v. MorganSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1959
  4. Gaddis v. SmithTexas Supreme Court · 1967
  5. Fernandi v. StrullySupreme Court of New Jersey · 1961

40 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by41 opinions

  1. Neel v. Magana, Olney, Levy, Cathcart & GelfandCalifornia Supreme Court · 1971
  2. Davies v. KrasnaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  3. April Enterprises, Inc. v. KTTVCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1983
  4. Grady v. A.H. Robins Co.Court of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1988
  5. G. D. Searle & Co. v. Superior CourtCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1975

36 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API