Price v. Atlantic Ro-Ro Carriers, Inc.
District Court, D. Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
Catherine C. Blake, United States District Judge
Third-party defendant The Rukert Terminals Corporation (“Rukert”) has filed- a motion for summary judgment in this long-running litigation, alleging that Mos Shipping Co., Ltd., (“Mos”) is barred by the Longshore and Harbor Workers’ Compensation Act'(“LHWCA”), 33 U.S.C. §§ 901 et seq,, from, pursuing a claim for indemnity or contribution against Rukert. No oral argument is necessary. See Local Rule 105.6 (D. Md, 2016). For the reasons stated below, the motion for summary judgment will be granted.
BACKGROUND
This action arises out of an…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Parklane Hosiery Co. v. ShoreSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- Montana v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- National Labor Relations Board v. Browning-Ferris Industries of Pennsylvania, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Brinkley v. Harbour Recreation ClubCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1999
- Howlett v. Birkdale Shipping Co., S.A.Supreme Court of the United States · 1994
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Holder v. Fraser Shipyards, Inc.District Court, W.D. Wisconsin · 2018
- Glover and Pridemore v. HryniewichDistrict Court, E.D. Virginia · 2022