Legal Opinion

Gonzales v. Harris

District Court, E.D. California

Decided May 13, 1981No. Nos. CV F 79-215-EDP, CV F 80-119-EDPPublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

PRICE, District Judge.

These cases were ordered consolidated for oral argument so that the court could consider the following portion of 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1):1

“(b)(1) Notwithstanding any provision of law to the contrary—

(A) a judge may designate a magistrate to hear and determine any pretrial matter pending before the court, except a motion for injunctive relief, for judgment on the pleadings, for summary judgment, to dismiss or quash an indictment or information made by the defendant, to suppress evidence in a criminal case, to dismiss or to permit maintenance of a class action, to dismiss…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Park Motor Mart, Inc. v. Ford Motor CompanyCourt of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1980
  2. United States v. Royal BarneyCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  3. Webb v. CalifanoDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1979
  4. Thompson v. RoseDistrict Court, W.D. Tennessee · 1981
  5. Terrell Oil Corp. v. Atlantic Richfield Co.District Court, E.D. Tennessee · 1978

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Gonzales v. HarrisDistrict Court, E.D. California · 1981
  2. D & R Distributing Co., Inc. v. Chambers Corp.District Court, E.D. California · 1984

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API