Gonzales v. Harris
District Court, E.D. California
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM DECISION AND ORDER FOR JUDGMENT
PRICE, District Judge.
As indicated by separate Memorandum Decision filed herein, D.C., 514 F.Supp. 991, the defendant is not entitled to a de novo determination of the issues raised by the objections to the magistrate’s recommendations which were not timely filed. However, in view of the importance of the questions raised in this case, and the potential for the same type of issues recurring in this district, the court has taken special pains to determine whether or not the magistrate’s recommendations comport with the applicable law.
At the outset, it…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Blythe v. AyresCalifornia Supreme Court · 1892
- In re the Estate of JessupCalifornia Supreme Court · 1889
- Estate of BairdCalifornia Supreme Court · 1924
- Gird v. BennettCalifornia Supreme Court · 1910
- Estate of LundCalifornia Supreme Court · 1945
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- Jason J. Owens, by and Through Theresa Owens, Mother and Next Friend v. Richard S. Schweiker, Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1982
- Morales v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Morales ex rel. Morales v. BowenCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1987
- Denise Desonier, Amanda M. Desonier v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990
- Denise Desonier, Amanda M. Desonier v. Louis W. Sullivan, M.D., Secretary of Health and Human ServicesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1990