Legal Opinion

United States v. Royal Barney

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided January 17, 1978No. 77-1880PublishedCited by 493 opinions

1Per curiam

The joinder of the charge against appellant and Johnson of knowingly transporting a stolen vehicle in interstate commerce with the charge against Johnson of perjury did not violate Fed.R.Crim.P. 8(b). The perjury count against Johnson alleged that he lied to the grand jury about a receipt found in appellant’s possession when appellant was apprehended while driving the stolen truck. This receipt, which bore Johnson’s fingerprint, was relevant evidence against appellant on the stolen vehicle charge as well as against Johnson on the perjury count. Thus, Johnson’s alleged false testimony related…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. United States v. MarionSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  2. United States v. RoselliCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
  3. United States v. Maurice H. Friedman, United States of America v. Manuel JacobsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1971
  4. United States v. James Henry SimmonsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1976
  5. John A. Metheany v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1966

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by493 opinions

  1. United States v. Edward TerryCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
  2. United States v. Edward Ford, Robert Little, John Felix, Solomon Johnson, Phillip Usquiano, Marcus Thompson, E. Dene ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1980
  3. United States v. Lamar Adams, United States of America v. James Lee PinkertonCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  4. United States v. McDonaldCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1978
  5. State v. Martinez-VillarealArizona Supreme Court · 1985

488 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API