Legal Opinion
Brown v. Boren
California Court of Appeal
Decided September 17, 1999No. B128000PublishedCited by 50 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
MASTERSON, J.
Introduction
Plaintiff Mary Lou Brown appeals from the adverse judgment entered after the trial court granted a motion for judgment (Code Civ. Proc., § 631.8) 1 made by defendants Ira J. Boren and Elizabeth S. Boren at the conclusion of plaintiff’s case. We affirm.
Statement of Facts 2
In November 1992, plaintiff sold two pieces of real property to Ruffino M. Anderson (Anderson). These properties were located at 1009 East 56th Street and 1019-1021½ East 56th Street in Los Angeles, California. Anderson was a real estate agent with Century 21 A&W II and the person with whom…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- In Re Marriage of ArceneauxCalifornia Supreme Court · 1990
- Maria P. v. RilesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1987
- Mattco Forge, Inc. v. Arthur Young & Co.California Court of Appeal · 1997
- Stevens v. Owens-Corning Fiberglas Corp.California Court of Appeal · 1996
- Yeap v. LeakeCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1997
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by50 opinions
- JRS Products, Inc. v. Matsushita Electric Corp. of AmericaCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2004
- Slovensky v. FriedmanCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2006
- Hines v. California Coastal CommissionCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2010
- Bermudez v. CiolekCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2015
- Citizens Business Bank v. GevorgianCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2013
45 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.