Legal Opinion
United States v. King
Court of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit
Decided June 29, 1999No. 98-5393PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FAY, Senior Circuit Judge:
A federal grand jury returned a single-count indictment charging Paul Maxwell King (“King”) with stealing money insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b). After being found guilty at a jury trial, King was sentenced to a 12-month term of imprisonment and ordered to pay restitution in the amount of $9,334.66 to Loomis Fargo (an armored transport company). On appeal, King argues the money being transported by Loomis Fargo was not in the care, custody or control of a federally insured bank when stolen, and therefore, the…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Eli Lubin and Glenn M. Tharp, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Joseph JakalskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
- White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936
- United States v. George Harold DammCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1998
- United States v. Jose Cepeda Mafnas, Also Known as Joseph Cepeda MafnasCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
3Cited by4 opinions
- United States v. Terrance McCarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. Fred Blajos, AKA Freddie Martinez BlajosCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. TaniguchiCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 2002
- United States v. McCarter, TerranceCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005