United States v. Fred Blajos, AKA Freddie Martinez Blajos
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
GRABER, Circuit Judge.
■ The main question for decision is whether, in a prosecution for armed bank robbery under 18 U.S.C. § 2113, the Government is required to prove that the money taken by the defendant was insured by the Federal Deposit Insurance Corporation (FDIC), or whether the Government is required 8479 to prove only that the institution from which the money was taken was FDIC-insured. We hold that the latter interpretation is correct and, accordingly, affirm.
Defendant Fred Blajos’ conviction for armed bank robbery stems from his participation in a scheme to steal money from an…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- United States v. PowellSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
- Atonio v. Wards Cove Packing Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Eli Lubin and Glenn M. Tharp, Jr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1963
- United States v. Charles Cornelius JamesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1993
- UNITED STATES of America, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. Aleko RRAPI, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1999
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United States v. Terrance McCarterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2005
- United States v. HaasCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2010
- Chamberlain v. PlilerDistrict Court, C.D. California · 2004
- United States v. ArnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2003
- Blajos v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2002
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.