Legal Opinion
United States v. Joseph Jakalski
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 7, 1956No. 11746_1PublishedCited by 42 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
SWAIM, Circuit Judge.
This is an appeal from an order of the United States District Court for the Northern District of Illinois, Eastern Division, denying the motions of Joseph Jakalski (hereinafter referred to as defendant) for a new trial on the ground of newly discovered evidence and to vacate and correct sentence pursuant to 28 U.S.C.A. § 2255.
The defendant not being present for oral argument, the Government waived argument and this appeal was submitted on the record and briefs.
On February 8, 1951, the defendant was found guilty by a jury of having violated the Bamc Robbery Act,. 18 U .S.…
2Cases cited12 opinions
- Mooney v. HolohanSupreme Court of the United States · 1935
- United States v. HaymanSupreme Court of the United States · 1952
- United States v. JohnsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1946
- Davilman v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1950
- United States v. SpadaforaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1952
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by42 opinions
- The People v. BakerIllinois Supreme Court · 1959
- Francis J. Curran, Francis J. Maguire and Ira F. Jones, Jr. v. State of DelawareCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1958
- United States v. Newton Wilkerson Anderson, Jr.Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1978
- United States v. John William Marx and William Frederick ShriverCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1973
- People v. BrownIllinois Supreme Court · 1995
37 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.