Legal Opinion

United States v. Jose Cepeda Mafnas, Also Known as Joseph Cepeda Mafnas

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided March 8, 1983No. 82-1431PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

Appellant (Mafnas) was convicted in the U.S. District Court of Guam of stealing money from two federally insured banks in violation of 18 U.S.C. § 2113(b) which makes it a crime to “... take ... with intent to steal ... any money belonging to ... any bank .... ”

Mafnas was employed by the Guam Armored Car Service (Service), which was hired by the Bank of Hawaii and the Bank of America to deliver bags of money.

On three occasions Mafnas opened the bags and removed money. As a result he was convicted of three counts of stealing money from the banks.

This Circuit has held that § 2113(b) applies…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. United States v. Joseph JakalskiCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1956
  2. Edward S. Lemasters, Sr. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1967
  3. Clifford L. Lionberger, D.B.A. Lionberger's Auto Parts v. The United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1967
  4. William S. Bennett v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1968
  5. White v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1936

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. United States v. Maria L. GalindoCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1989
  2. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  3. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999
  4. United States v. KingCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 1999

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API