Bowers v. Soper
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtUrner, J.
In the case of Shirk v. Soper et al., Trustees, 144 Md. 269, an order ratifying a sale of certain real estate by the trustees was reversed on the ground that the sale was made for an inadequate price, but the opinion of this Court stated that the reversal would not “affect any right which the purchaser may have in the property sold under the decree.” The reason for this reservation was that no appeal bond had been filed, and the lower court had provided that the operation of the order ratifying the sale should not be stayed by the appeal. The discretionary power of the court to so limit the…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Shirk v. SoperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
- Garritee v. PoppleinCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1891
- Lenderking v. RosenthalCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1885
- Raith v. New Baltimore Building & Loan Ass'nCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1922
- Karr, Hammond & Darnall v. ShirkCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1923
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
- Franzen v. DubinokCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
- Osztreicher v. JuanteguyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1995
- Acting Director, Department of Forests & Parks v. WalkerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
- County Corporation v. SemmesCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1936
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.