Karr, Hammond & Darnall v. Shirk
Court of Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the CourtOffutt, J.
So far as can be learned from the record, the facts of this ease, which are material to the questions before us, are these: On January 26, 1913, The Oak Street Permanent Building Association of Baltimore City filed in the Circuit Court of Baltimore City its petition against Henry Shirk for the sale of certain mortgaged premises, in that city, and on the same day a decree for the sale of the property was passed. John L. Cornell, the trustee named in the decree, after filing1 his bond, sold the property and reported the sale to the court, and in due course the sale thus reported was ratified…
2Cases cited17 opinions
- Cecil v. CecilCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1862
- Lurman v. HubnerCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1892
- Preston v. PoeCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1911
- Hall v. JackCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1870
- Rayner v. NugentCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1883
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Switkes v. John McShain, Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1953
- Lopez-Sanchez v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2005
- Maryland-National Capital Park and Planning Commission v. McCawCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1967
- Brantley v. Fallston General Hospital Inc.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1994
- Bowers v. SoperCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1925
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.