Legal Opinion

Osztreicher v. Juanteguy

Court of Appeals of Maryland

Decided June 19, 1995No. 77PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

BELL, Judge.

We granted certiorari in this case to consider whether a medical expert witness may be required to produce his or her tax and financial records for use by the opposing party for impeachment purposes. Regrettably, the response of the party calling the expert medical witness to adverse rulings by the trial court prevents our reaching this most interesting issue. We shall hold, instead, that the election of Istvan Osztreicher, the appellant and plaintiff below, to refrain from presenting a case was an acquiescence in, or consent to, the adverse judgment subsequently entered against…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Rocks v. BrosiusCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1966
  2. Banegura v. TaylorCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1988
  3. Lohss and Sprenkle v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1974
  4. Franzen v. DubinokCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1981
  5. Turner v. Washington Suburban Sanitary CommissionCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1960

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Ware v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2000
  2. Suter v. StuckeyCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2007
  3. Long v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  4. Boyd v. BowenCourt of Special Appeals of Maryland · 2002
  5. Driggs Corp. v. Maryland Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1998

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API