Legal Opinion
Goldstein v. Clifford
District Court, D. New Jersey
Decided August 21, 1968No. Civ. 732-68, 775-68PublishedCited by 14 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
KALODNER, Circuit Judge.
Constitutionality of an Act of Congress empowering the President of the United States, until June 28, 1968, to “order to active duty any unit of the Ready Reserve of an armed force for a period of not to exceed twenty-four months”, is challenged in these proceedings instituted by three members of the 177th Tactical Fighter Group, Air National Guard of the United States (“Group”).
The Act involved is Section 101(e) of Title 1, Public Law 89-687, October 15, 1966, 80 Stat. 981, 10 U.S.C.A. § 263 note (1967 Cum.Supp.). It reads as follows:
“Notwithstanding any other…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Home Building & Loan Assn. v. BlaisdellSupreme Court of the United States · 1934
- Orloff v. WilloughbySupreme Court of the United States · 1953
- Lichter v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
- Robert Luftig v. Robert S. McNamara Secretary of DefenseCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1967
- Morse v. BoswellDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 1968
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by14 opinions
- Capt. Milbert Mindes v. Dr. Robert C. Seaman, Secretary of the United States Air ForceCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1971
- Jackson v. United StatesUnited States Court of Claims · 1978
- Johnson v. PowellCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1969
- Private Paul v. Winters, Jr. v. United States of America, Major General Louis J. FieldsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1969
- Morse v. BoswellCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1968
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.