Legal Opinion

Equity Service Corp. v. Agull

City of New York Municipal Court

Decided May 10, 1935Published

1Opinion of the CourtWinter, J.

In this action plaintiff is suing to recover the sum of $130 alleged to be due on a contract styled a “ hazard agreement ” by the terms of which plaintiff advanced to defendant through an assignor the sum of $200. Contemporaneously and as a part of the transaction the defendant executed a bill of sale of his automobile conditioned on his paying the sum of $260 in installments with the usual reservations in the event of default, except that repossession and sale discharged any resultant deficiency, provided the mortgagor had not defaulted on the mortgage or the hazard agreement. Plaintiff…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Eames v. Home InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1877
  2. State v. BeardsleySupreme Court of Minnesota · 1902
  3. Attorney General v. C. E. Osgood Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1924
  4. People v. Standard Plate Glass & Salvage Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1916
  5. Barna v. Clifford Country Estates, Inc.City of New York Municipal Court · 1932

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API