Legal Opinion

David Cupello v. State of Indiana

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided March 11, 2015No. 49A02-1406-CR-394PublishedCited by 13 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

NAJAM, Judge.

[1] In Barnes v. State, 953 N.E.2d 478, 474-75 (Ind.2011), our supreme court held on rehearing that “the Castle Doctrine is not a defense to the crime of battery or other violent acts on a police officer.”1 In so holding, the Barnes court noted that “[t]he General Assembly can and does create statutory defenses to the offenses it criminalizes, and the crime of battery against a police officer stands on no different ground. What the statutory defenses should be, if any, is in its hands.” Id. at 475.

[2] In its legislative response to Barnes, the General Assembly found and declared…

Also in this document: Concurrence.

2Cases cited12 opinions

  1. United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
  3. Tapp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
  4. Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
  5. Middleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by13 opinions

  1. Dorothy Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  2. Kiel Stone v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
  3. Lance E. Brown v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  4. Jefferson Jean-Baptiste v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
  5. Andrew J. Stone v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019

8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API