David Cupello v. State of Indiana
Indiana Court of Appeals
1Opinion of the Court
NAJAM, Judge.
[1] In Barnes v. State, 953 N.E.2d 478, 474-75 (Ind.2011), our supreme court held on rehearing that “the Castle Doctrine is not a defense to the crime of battery or other violent acts on a police officer.”1 In so holding, the Barnes court noted that “[t]he General Assembly can and does create statutory defenses to the offenses it criminalizes, and the crime of battery against a police officer stands on no different ground. What the statutory defenses should be, if any, is in its hands.” Id. at 475.
[2] In its legislative response to Barnes, the General Assembly found and declared…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. SantanaSupreme Court of the United States · 1976
- Tobar v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 2000
- Tapp v. StateIndiana Court of Appeals · 1980
- Cox v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1998
- Middleton v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1999
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by13 opinions
- Dorothy Williams v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Kiel Stone v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2019
- Lance E. Brown v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2016
- Jefferson Jean-Baptiste v. State of IndianaIndiana Court of Appeals · 2017
- Andrew J. Stone v. State of Indiana (mem. dec.)Indiana Court of Appeals · 2019
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.