Legal Opinion

Sussman v. Tanoue

District Court, District of Columbia

Decided February 4, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-0321(AER)PublishedCited by 14 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

AUBREY E. ROBINSON, Jr., District Judge.

Presently before the Court are cross-motions for summary judgment and Plaintiffs’ motion to unseal. The Court has considered the pleadings carefully and, for the reasons stated below, the Court will grant Defendant’s motion for summary judgment on Counts Three, Four, and Seven, and deny the other pending motions, including Plaintiffs’ motion to unseal.

I. Background

Plaintiffs filed a seven count First Amended Complaint seeking to vindicate their rights under Title VII of the Civil Rights Act of 1964 and other federal laws. Count One, which alleged…

2Cases cited37 opinions

  1. Anderson v. Liberty Lobby, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1986
  2. McDonnell Douglas Corp. v. GreenSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Texas Department of Community Affairs v. BurdineSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
  4. United States Postal Service Board of Governors v. AikensSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  5. Etim U. Aka v. Washington Hospital CenterCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1998

32 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by14 opinions

  1. MD/DC/DE Broadcasters Ass'n v. Federal Communications CommissionCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 2001
  2. Romero-Ostolaza v. RidgeDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  3. Keeley v. SmallDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2005
  4. Smith-Thompson v. District of ColumbiaDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2009
  5. Marshall v. JamesDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2003

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API