Legal Opinion

In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge

Alaska Supreme Court

Decided November 30, 1988No. S-2529PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

COMPTON, Justice.

This case presents the question of whether the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct (the Commission) acted within the authority given to it by the Alaska Constitution in publicly reprimanding a judge.

In 1986 Appellant 1 was served with a formal complaint regarding actions by Appellant in a judicial capacity that arose out of events which occurred in 1985. Appellant contested the complaint, and a hearing was conducted before the Commission.

The Commission concluded that there was insufficient evidence to support a finding of an actual impropriety committed by Appellant.…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Zauderer v. Office of Disciplinary Counsel of the Supreme Court of OhioSupreme Court of the United States · 1985
  2. Geiler v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
  3. Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
  4. Mosk v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1979
  5. West Virginia Judicial Inquiry Commission v. DostertWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1980

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
  2. In Re Inquiry Concerning a JudgeAlaska Supreme Court · 1990
  3. Turney v. StateAlaska Supreme Court · 1997
  4. Goldman Ex Rel. Goldman-Wilson v. Nevada Commission on Judicial DisciplineNevada Supreme Court · 1992
  5. In Re CummingsAlaska Supreme Court · 2009

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API