In Re Inquiry Concerning a Judge
Alaska Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
COMPTON, Justice.
This is the second time this case has been before the court. See In re Inquiry Concerning a Judge, 762 P.2d 1292 (Alaska 1988) (Judge I). After holding that the Alaska Commission on Judicial Conduct (Commission) has no constitutional authority to publicly reprimand a judge, Judge I, 762 P.2d at 1296, we remanded the matter to the Commission for recommendation of an appropriate sanction. Id. We did not address the merits of the Commission’s findings and conclusions at that time. The Commission now has recommended public censure. We reject the recommendation and impose…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Spruance v. Commission on Judicial QualificationsCalifornia Supreme Court · 1975
- In Re HansonAlaska Supreme Court · 1975
- In the Disciplinary Matter Involving BuckalewAlaska Supreme Court · 1987
- In Re Inquiry Relating to RomeSupreme Court of Kansas · 1975
- Matter of HaddadArizona Supreme Court · 1981
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by32 opinions
- In Re BrownMichigan Supreme Court · 1999
- Abington Ltd. Partnership v. HeubleinSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1998
- In Re the Proceeding Under AS 22.30.070(c) in Relation to JohnstoneAlaska Supreme Court · 2000
- In re FlanaganSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1997
- Coffey’s CaseSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 2008
27 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.