Legal Opinion

Securities and Exchange Commission v. Maurice Rind

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided April 19, 1993No. 91-55972PublishedCited by 90 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

WALLACE, Chief Judge:

This interlocutory appeal raises an important issue of first impression: what, if any, statute of limitations applies to a civil enforcement action brought by the Securities and Exchange Commission (Commission). We must also decide whether the right to a jury trial guaranteed by the Seventh Amendment attaches where the Commission sues for disgorgement of illegal profits. The district court held that the Commission was not bound by a statute of limitations and that Rind did not have a right to a jury trial. The district court had jurisdiction pursuant to 15 U.S.C. §§…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Lampf, Pleva, Lipkind, Prupis & Petigrow v. GilbertsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1991
  2. Tull v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1987
  3. Chauffeurs, Teamsters & Helpers Local No. 391 v. TerrySupreme Court of the United States · 1990
  4. Occidental Life Insurance v. Equal Employment Opportunity CommissionSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
  5. United States v. SummerlinSupreme Court of the United States · 1940

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by90 opinions

  1. Securities & Exchange Commission v. LawbaughDistrict Court, D. Maryland · 2005
  2. Kokesh v. Sec. & Exch. Comm'nSupreme Court of the United States · 2017
  3. Securities & Exchange Commission v. CalvoCourt of Appeals for the Eleventh Circuit · 2004
  4. Fifty-Six Hope Road Music, Ltd. v. A.V.E.L.A., Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 2015
  5. P. Stolz Family Partnership L.P. v. DaumCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2004

85 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API